Social Deviance Of Religous Cults

The subject of deviance , taken from any(prenominal) context---be it political spiritual or cultural---has fueled many heated debates over the decades Although the has accumulated a rather large body of knowledge experts , theorists , critics and academicians be no closer to reaching an agreement roughly anything . check to Clinard (2004 , deviance takes many forms , but the agreement remains debatable about which specific behaviors and conditions constitute deviance . This ambiguity becomes curiously plain when some deal praise the same behaviour that others sentence . To register deviance , one must branch understand this contradiction : No consensus reliably identifies behaviour , people , or conditions that argon deviant , although most people would set up that they know deviance when they see it (p .2People c an , and often are , labeled deviant for alternative attitudes or belief systems that affiliate from what company considers prescribed norms These alternative belief systems may be , but not limited to , a religious or political category , wherein the people who ascribe to such witness are considered to hold strange and unorthodox perspectives (e .g cult members , uttermost(prenominal) political leftists , Satanists (Adler Adler ,1994Taking note of these contemporary times , nothing is more than than pellucid , than the global religious diversity and the conflicts in society that devise from it . But what is the threshold of tolerance when it comes to religion , more specifically when it comes to cults ? Sociologists cannot seem to agree on how society should pass get through when it comes to these new religious movements and how these new religious movements affect the maturement of prescribed norms . Clinard (2004 , in Sociology of Deviant Behaviour , highlights a gene that is essential to understanding , ! and not judging , cultic behaviour when he stated that , if we remove the religious component , the criterion for whether the tact in question should be forbidden should rest on whether there is any demonstrable objectively measurable handy harm resulting from it (p .

15Sociology , as a scientific discipline , commits itself to the strive for general , explanatory theories that shed light , albeit in an junky way , to the probable causes of empirical change in any given societal situation . In the sub-area of religion , further , it is extremely difficult to encapsulate the diverse cultural , amicable an d spiritual processes in one neat idea . thereof , the sociological task is to embrace , in analytical formulations of extensive employment , diverse cultural contents---and the unstated but heavy , assumption of sociologists is that their concepts should , like those of natural scientists , be of universal exercise . It has been commonplace of modern sociological theory that social systems necessitate for their integration on value consensus , and that such consensus attains its ultimate characterisation in religion (Barker ,1982 ,p .16There is definitely a clamour on the part of sociologists and the general public to discuss the effects , each positive or detrimental of cults on society . In the official webpage of the Organization for Religious Tolerance , this appears : CULTS a .k .a . tonic Religious Movements Are they spiritual , positive , gentle , open , heretical mind-controling , dangerous , homicidal .or all of the above ? Sociology in response to... If you want to get a full essay, assert it on our w! ebsite: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper