IP 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

IP 3 - Essay Example This fallacy involves two steps, which include attacking the character of the author of the claim made and taking the attack as evidence against the argument made by the author in question, (Mills & Hard pressed Poetry, 2002). The following represents an example of this kind of fallacy This fallacy involves presentation of an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the initial subject matter. The underlying idea in this fallacy is to influence a win through leading the attention away from the claim to another subject (Mills & Hard pressed Poetry, 2002). Consider the following example I suppose there is immense advantage in making the requirements of the graduate students stricter. I advocate that you add weight on it support it, too. After all, we are undergoing a budget predicament and we need not to have our salaries affected. This fallacy provides a biased exchange by asking a question that has an unfounded supposition constructed right into the question with the aim of manipulating the answer given (Mills & Hard pressed Poetry, 2002). The following example presents this fallacy. This fallacy is committed when an argument attempts to determine the causal connection by mistake. There are two primary interrelated types. They include Post hoc ergo propter hoc which involves an argument that one event was caused by another just because it happened after the said event. In addition, the causal connections are hard to determine and the Non-Causa pro Causa which implies no cause for a cause (Mills & Hard pressed Poetry, 2002). Consider the following example. This is a kind of fallacy where an author applies a supposition in un-wanted position. It involves using of a common statement in a more general manner (Mills & Hard pressed Poetry, 2002). Consider the following example. This fallacy involves an assertion from a person that a certain occurrence must predictably follow from another without any claim